TY - SLIDE TI - Examples of trade-offs and multiple ecosystem services assessment in the integrated management of maritime pine landscapes. T2 - Governing and manaing forest for multiple ecosystem serrvices across the globe A2 - Orazio, Christophe AB - We have few tools to estimate trade-offs and ecosystem servicesĀ at stand and landscape level In planted forests main ecosystem service expected by owner and society is wood production, but they provide a large range of ecosystem services in an integrated way Segregation and integration debate is not fully relevant as there is a large gradient of options and opinions should be less polarized and more focused on territory specific problems solving with appropriate land capacity and land use planning using new tools available Some ecosystem services rely on decision taken at stand level without any governance but market driven while other are regulated or promoted by good practices guidelines such as certification Most of the ecosystem services and forest resilience could be optimized a the landscape level, tools are there but lack of land use planing governance at this scale in France (since decentralisation in 1985?) CY - Bonn DA - 2020/02/27/ PY - 2020 LA - English ER -